Comparison guide
DevClocked vs WakaTime
The short answer: WakaTime tells you how many hours you spent in your editor. DevClocked tells you what those hours — and your AI agents — actually produced. WakaTime is the established choice for passive coding-time tracking; DevClocked is built for the AI-agent era, measuring leverage and output rather than just time-in-editor.
Last updated: May 22, 2026
At a glance
| DevClocked | WakaTime | |
|---|---|---|
| Core metric | Leverage (output per unit of effort) | Time spent coding |
| AI agent tracking | Yes — Claude Code, Codex CLI and other agents as first-class | Limited / editor-centric |
| Token tracking | Yes | No |
| Tracks work, not just time | Work Blocks + Leverage Score | Time-based heartbeats |
| Editor coverage | IDE, terminal, agent, browser and GitHub signals | Broad IDE/editor plugin support (its biggest strength) |
| Best for | AI-augmented developers who want to measure output | Developers who want a long-term log of coding hours |
| Pricing | Check current pricing | Free tier + paid; check current pricing |
What WakaTime does well
Credit where it's due — WakaTime is the category veteran and it earns it. Its editor plugin coverage is genuinely excellent: it supports a huge range of IDEs and editors, the heartbeat-based tracking is passive and reliable, and if all you want is a clean, long-running record of how many hours you've spent in which languages and projects, it's hard to beat. The dashboards are mature and the data export is solid. If your question is "how much time did I spend coding this month?", WakaTime answers it well.
Where DevClocked is different
DevClocked starts from a different question: not how long but how much did you get done — and increasingly, how much did your AI agents get done.
- Agent tracking is first-class, not bolted on. DevClocked treats Claude Code, Codex CLI and other coding agents as primary actors in your workflow. WakaTime was built for a world where a human typed every line; in an agent-heavy workflow, raw editor time stops correlating with output.
- Leverage Score over hours. The headline metric is leverage — what you shipped relative to the effort it took — not a stopwatch. Two developers can log the same hours and have wildly different output; DevClocked surfaces that gap.
- Token tracking. Agent work has a real, measurable cost in tokens. DevClocked tracks it; WakaTime doesn't.
- Analytics depth and design. DevClocked's analytics go deeper into how work actually happens (Work Blocks, leverage trends, agent vs human contribution) and the interface is built to make that legible at a glance.
Feature by feature
| Feature | DevClocked | WakaTime |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic time tracking | Yes | Yes |
| AI coding agent tracking | Yes (first-class) | No / minimal |
| Token + cost tracking | Yes | No |
| Output / leverage metrics | Yes (Leverage Score) | No |
| Work Blocks | Yes | No |
| Leaderboard | Yes (Leverage Leaderboard) | Yes (coding-time leaderboards) |
| Editor/IDE plugin breadth | Focused on agent-aware workflows | Very broad (strength) |
| Long-term coding-hours log | Yes | Yes (strength) |
Who each tool is for
WakaTime is for developers who want a durable activity log. If your main goal is to know how many hours you spent in VS Code, Vim, JetBrains, or another editor, WakaTime is still a strong choice. It is especially good when editor breadth matters more than agent analytics.
DevClocked is for developers who want to understand output and leverage. If your workflow includes Claude Code, Codex CLI, terminal sessions, browser research, GitHub activity, and IDE work, DevClocked gives you a broader picture of what happened and whether the effort translated into useful output.
You can use both. Some teams keep WakaTime as a historical editor-time ledger and add DevClocked for agent-era analytics: token and cost visibility, Work Blocks, agent vs human contribution, and Leverage Score. They answer different questions, so the honest choice is not always either/or.
Pricing
WakaTime offers a free tier with paid plans above it; DevClocked's current pricing is on its site. Both are accessible to individual developers — pick on capability fit, not price. (Verify current pricing on each site before relying on it.)
FAQ
Yes — DevClocked is an alternative built for AI-augmented development. WakaTime measures time in your editor; DevClocked measures the leverage and output of your work, including what your AI agents produce.
WakaTime is built around editor heartbeats, so agent work done outside the editor (e.g. via Claude Code or Codex CLI) isn't its focus. DevClocked tracks those agents as first-class.
WakaTime tracks how long you code. DevClocked tracks what you produced and how much leverage your effort and your agents generated.
Yes. DevClocked tracks token usage and cost from coding agents. WakaTime does not.
Yes. WakaTime can remain your editor-time history, while DevClocked adds agent tracking, token cost, Work Blocks and leverage analytics on top.
Verdict
WakaTime remains an excellent passive coding-time tracker with unmatched editor coverage. But it was designed for a pre-agent world. If your workflow now includes AI coding agents and you want to measure leverage and output — not just hours — DevClocked is the tool built for that reality.